The Canada/US (rate) Divergence

We see a few plausible explanations for this widening divergence in expectations. One explanation could be the fact that the “starting point” of the easing cycle is not the same. The US overnight rate is currently 5.25-5.50% while Canada’s is at 5%. If one were to assume the same “final” target rate, the Fed would need two more cuts to reach it.

Another very important factor is the tone adopted by the Governor Macklem. Since January’s press conference and as recently as his February 6th speech and question period in Montreal, he has consistently pushed back against the effects of interest rates on housing projects and supply, and has taken the view that while mortgage refinancing has strained Canadian households, they are still able to meet their obligations. In essence, he sees the present “difficult” period as an adjustment period that will be over by the second half of 2024.

However, the Governor has acknowledged that the main risk to this trajectory is a potential degradation of the employment picture and rise in unemployment.

In divergence lies opportunity

In our view, the fundamentals of the Canadian economy remain less sound and more fragile than that of the US. As highlighted in a number of previous notes, the high degree of leverage of households and the fact that this exposure is floating in nature creates the distinctive vulnerability of the Canadian economy compared to the US economy, in case of a slowdown and/or increase in unemployment.

As such, this divergence in expected overnight rates is likely capped at the levels we see today. For it to further widen it would require either of:

• The market expecting stickier and higher inflation in Canada than the US in the coming quarters.
• The effects of a potential economic slowdown to be much more severe in the US than Canada.

Both these elements, while possible, have a low probability of materializing in our view.

As a result, one might consider a relative value opportunity which consists in positioning – whether from an investment perspective or a risk management one - for a closing of this Canada/US gap in expectations.

This type of positioning can be expressed and structured in many ways depending on the specific risk appetite and constraints of investors, but generically speaking, it would require taking a long position (in price terms) in Canada in the 1-year horizon versus a short position (in price terms) in US 1-year horizon. An indirect alternative would be to look for an increase in USDCAD over the quarters to come.

For a more in-depth discussion on how to incorporate such a scenario in your portfolios and hedges please do not hesitate to reach out to us.