The storm on the horizon

At first glance, last week was another quiet five days for the currency markets. GBPUSD barely deviated from 1.40 – 1.41, EURUSD was stuck between 1.2220 and 1.2320 and USDCAD traded a tight range between 1.2750 and 1.2900. This was despite a plethora of data from both sides of the Atlantic, coupled with Trump and Chinese authorities exchanging blows over trade. In this week’s report, we consider two reasons why this state of calm may not persist…


Non-Farm Payrolls

Friday’s US employment report showed a disappointing 103,000 new jobs created in the March, undershooting expectations for 185,000. Unsurprisingly, the dollar came under immediate pressure against both the pound (see chart below) and the euro, losing around a cent against each, but most commentators seem to have shrugged off the disappointing headline number and instead decided to focus on an increase in average earnings and an upward revision to February’s reading.


Chart 1: GBPUSD – Payroll Impact (circled in red)

Source: Bloomberg


This is reflected in the Fed Funds Futures rate which is still pricing a 60% probability of another 25 basis point hike in June (unchanged from last week) although there appears slightly less confidence in further hikes in September and December. We’ve previously written about our skepticism for four Fed hikes this year and this further justifies our cautious stance.


Trade Wars

When Trump won the Presidential election back in 2016, he promised to deal with the annual $360 billion trade deficit with China. As seen elsewhere, Trump has followed through on his pledge and last week, US officials announced a list of products that could be targeted with a 25% tariff worth $50 billion. The following day, China responded with a list of US imports upon which it could impose tariffs worth $50bn (honors even).


Chart 2: Monthly US trade deficit with China

Source: Bloomberg


Despite a little wobble in equity markets, the general consensus seems to be that this war of words is simply a way of getting both parties to the negotiation table to discuss intellectual property rights and is unlikely to escalate into something more serious. Clearly Trump wants US companies to have access to the world’s second largest economy but without the cost of giving away too much IP. Meanwhile, China wants to continue growing and developing its output.


In a simple trade war (if such a thing can exist), China may well come off worse to begin with since the US is a net importer of China’s products. However, China has a number of other weapons in its arsenal including blocking US services, curtailing US oil shipments, a devaluation of the Yuan or dumping its massive holding of US Treasury Bills. The latter would have a dramatic tightening impact on US fiscal conditions and impede Trump’s ability to spend.


What impact could this have on currencies?

At this stage, the market seems content that the threats are unlikely to amount to actions and thus everything remains stable. Regular readers will know that one of our key reasons for being bullish on the dollar for 2018 was that if equity markets were to experience a significant reversal in trend, it would be beneficial for the dollar as investors around the world sought the safe haven of US Treasuries (as was the case during the financial crisis).

This theory still stands, but if China were to start selling US Treasuries as part of a trade war, the direct impact on the dollar would most likely be negative for the Greenback. Indirectly, if Trump were unable to fund his spending plans through issuing debt, the Fed may be forced to step in with monetary stimulus. As seen in recent years, QE has proven to be negative for the currency. Either way, the threat of heighted volatility is becoming increasingly apparent.


Author: Marc Cogliatti


White Papers



FX Hedging:

10 Common Pitfalls


Commodity & FX Risk:

An Integrated Approach


The Corporate Use of Credit Derivatives:

Where Next?


Corporate Hedger’s Guide to Basel III


Currency Volatility – Are markets nearing an inflection point?



FX Risk


“Validus designed an innovative and practical hedging strategy to address our underlying FX risk in the context of very distinct and diverse sources of competition. We are delighted with the outcome and impressed with their on-going response to the changing business and market dynamics”.


Paul Stobbs, Managing Director, Attraction World


Private Equity


 “The Validus team understand how private equity thinks about financial risk management issues and they are rigorous in the way they help our portfolio companies to understand and mitigate their risks.”


James Markham, Partner – Portfolio Management, Graphite Capital LLP


FX and Commodity Risk


“Validus provides us with independent strategic advice relating to our long-term currency and commodity risk management program.  The people are extremely capable and collaborate very well with our finance and operations teams here at JD Irving.”


Mark Bettle, Director, J.D. Irving Ltd.


FX  Risk


 “Validus developed a tailored hedging solution to mitigate the risks from our unique combination of existing supplier agreements. The implementation and management of this rolling hedging programme with our FX service providers has been expertly and efficiently handled”.  


Mark Goldby, Finance Director, SMS Electronics Ltd.


Commodity Risk


“Validus worked with us to develop a comprehensive commodity risk management programme – their analysis was both insightful and actionable.   We particularly value their independence, and they continue to work alongside our internal team to ensure our commodity price risks are managed effectively”

Gerry Gray, Finance Director, Strix Ltd.


FX, Commodity & Interest Rate Risk


“Validus comes up with risk management solutions that are innovative and comprehensive but practical to implement, that is their strength compared to other consulting companies we have worked with in the past.  Validus provided valuable insights into how FX, interest rate and commodity risks impact our organisation, and provide actionable recommendations and solutions.”


Andrew Ayres, Finance Director, U-POL Ltd.

Recent Comments